Since Donald Trump effectively wrapped up the Republican nomination this month, I’ve seen a lot of critical self-assessments from empirically minded journalists — FiveThirtyEight included, twice over — about what they got wrong on Trump. This instinct to be accountable for one’s predictions is good since the conceit of “data journalism,” at least as I see it, is to apply the scientific method to the news.
Read more at FiveThirtyEight.com
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment